WebThe most convincing form of disagreement is refutation. It's also the rarest, because it's the most work. Indeed, the disagreement hierarchy forms a kind of pyramid, in the sense that … WebJul 22, 2024 · Paul Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement is a useful tool for civil engagement. It also helps identify weak arguments. The hierarchy looks like this: 2. At the bottom of the pyramid, you have name-calling. It’s a type of argument that you see frequently, but it also happens to be the weakest type of argument.

Research:Newsletter/2024/December - Meta

WebGraham's Hierarchy of Disagreement. rumble. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment Top posts of August 23, 2024 ... Web"Graham proposed a "disagreement hierarchy" in a 2008 essay "How to Disagree", putting types of argument into a seven-point hierarchy and observing that "If moving up the disagreement hierarchy makes people less mean, that will make most of them happier." razor leviathan 2.1

How to disagree well: 7 of the best and worst ways to argue

http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html WebApr 7, 2014 · One topic was Graham’s “Hierarchy of Disagreement”. It provides a hierarchy of different ways people can disagree and the value of these disagreements. I wonder whether there is also something like a “Hierarchy of Agreement”. After all, there is a long research history regarding persuasion and different ways to get people to agree. WebA triangular graphic representing a "hierarchy of disagreement" from clear refutation to mere vituperation, based on the essay "How to Disagree" by Paul Graham. Date: 5 September 2008: Source: Traced by uploader; based on File:Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement.jpg by 'Loudacris' (originally from blog.createdebate.com) Author razorless shaving powder